View Single Post
  #38  
Old May 29th 11, 11:47 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Androcles[_43_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default Simple question about speed of force.


"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
...
| On Sun, 29 May 2011 08:35:02 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| .. .
| On Sun, 29 May 2011 02:41:39 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
|
| Silly old pommie engineer type question...
|
| Probably the best indicator of the speed of gravity is the
anomalous
| precession of the perihelion of Mercury...
|
|
|
| SR contradicts itself. Why try to defend any of it?
| http://www.scisite.info/wilson's_paradox.jpg
|
| You repeat this often. Do you have any evidence of SR claiming rubber
| bands
| contract?
|
| Freeze it if you like...
| SR claims all moving matter contracts...and you should know it.
|
| Actually I don't know it. I'd be interested if you could show me where
SR
| claims all moving matter contracts, but I suspect you don't know it
| either.
| -- Sky.Watcher
|
| You're obviously new here. I wont bother to explain..
|
| All right, I won't bother to read your ridiculous nonsense. You've
obviously
| no idea what you are talking about.
|
| Goodbye.
| -- Sky.Watcher
|
| What's your real motive? You haven't contributed anything scientific. You
| aapparently don't know anything about SR...so I can only assume you are
just
| part of the Einstein conspiracy, here to stifle any criticism of his
stupid
| theory.
|
|
Looks to me like he was asking you a question you couldn't answer.
You've lost that one, Wilson, he isn't bothering with you anymore.
I won't bother to explain.