On Mar 31, 12:03*am, NoEinstein wrote:
On Mar 29, 7:27*pm, rasterspace wrote:

if you're not going to answer any questions,
why are you in this forum, with only me, myself and Brian
to talk to?

unfortunately, you picked the least-likely target to attack,
in Liebniz, who actually ennunciated teh very, modern definition
of "to prove a mathematical argument, pure or applied."

Like you, I'm puzzled why fewer than 1% of my stated readership ever
replies. *

That's the cognitive dissonance with the little part of your mind that
is still sane, John.

But no worries. I'm sure the crazy part will take over in short
order....

That could be because they don't wish to be attacked the way
I am genetically built to withstand. *They also may be University
physics professors who would be fired for reading anything other than
what the Jewish textbook publishers will allow. *I'd bet that 60% or
more return, casually, to my posts, to see not just my New Science,
but how I keep parrying the attacks of others. *I wish I had no
detractors, but those tend not to care what anyone else but them
thinks. *— NE —

See? I told you!