On May 28, 12:07 am, BradGuth wrote:
On May 3, 7:56 pm, "Brad Guth" wrote:





"Brad Guth" wrote in message

news:943268f4698ce93ff8aabb231b766a9b.49644@mygat e.mailgate.org

VenusL2(VL2) is supposedly 1,014,300 km 1,014,200 km = 86% shaded by
Venus, receiving 14% worth of the solar photosphere plus a little extra
illumination.

As per usual, the incest mutated naysay mindset of Usenet is stuck
deeply into the nearest space toilet.

There's lots of absolutely nifty things (all good) about POOF City atVenusL2. Unfortunately, not even Usenet cam.misc is up to the task.

It's as though the topic/author taboo is still in full swing, of
covering thy silly Usenet butts. Even the MI/NSA spooks and moles have
backed off from this one.
-
Brad Guth

--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server -http://www.Mailgate.ORG

That's extremely odd, being that Venus L2(VL2) is so POOF City doable,
if not potentially a wee bit too cool, yet there's not an honest
contructive word within all of Usenet to behold. It's as though the
truth about much of anything is taboo rated.

There's sufficient evidence of other intelligent life existing/
coexisting on Venus, and at times it's as close by as 100 fold the
distance of our moon. You'd think that argument alone would be worth
a few other words by those claiming as knowing all there is to know.

Of accomplishing VL2 is just plain doable, as being well within
existing technology, though apparently I'm on the official NO FLY
list.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Why has this topic been to hard to grasp?

What's so insurmountable about utilizing VL2?

Wouldn't a mostly robotic platform of science instruments at Venus L2
be rather impressive, and otherwise downright nifty?

Wouldn't having a space depot/gateway as a human habitat of POOFs at
VL2 be a whole lot better off than anything ISS/ESS related?
- Brad Guth