On 5/25/20 2:07 PM, Alain Fournier wrote:
On May/24/2020 at 21:47, Doctor Who wrote :
On 5/24/20 8:57 PM, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says...

You can only expect a citation to the patent that will be filed some
months in the future, nothing else I think.

Not terribly encouraging given past experience with people claiming to
have invented a reactionless drive.

Here is a NASA paper on the subject of reactionless drives that simply
don't work, at least some of which were patented.

Responding to Mechanical Antigravity
Marc G. Millis - Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Nicholas E. Thomas - University of Miami, Miami, Florida
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070004897

I hope that the above will shed some light on wny I'm quite skeptical.

Jeff


you just don't get the point.

there is nothing mechanical, nor moving parts in an electromagnetic
reactionless drive.

I believe you that there are no moving parts. On the other hand, if you
look at a SpaceX launch, you really see it moving.


Alain Fournier


no I see it imploding during tests, and NASA's Loverro going away.

reactionless drive is not antigravity.