has written:
Rising Loonie writes:

Bookman writes:

Jim Moe writes:

Why should I use anything inaccurately, Bookman?

I think that Prof. Tholen is being harassed and razzed w/o restraint or
regard.
I think that this sincerely angers Prof. Tholen. He has stated, as
much, explicitly, on several occasions.


What you think is irrelevant, Loonie.

Note: no response.

Yes, what I or you 'think' is irrelevent. Its called being ignored.
Ignorance is a person's prerogative.

It seems as if he is mocked by many in the Usenet community because of
his annoyance with being harassed w/o restraint and his conviction to
stand up to and refute it.

What seems to you is also irrelevant, Loonie.

Absolutely so ...
It's the human condition.

It indicates ineffectualness, ignorance and lack of awareness.

... What a shame.

How astute of you.

What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
... Yet again, an astute observation from a noted astronomer.

OS/2 is for the most part, irrelevent.
Ignorance is IBM's prerogative.

see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/15/os2_dead_again/