View Single Post
  #2  
Old January 3rd 07, 10:48 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Henri Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,378
Default Perihelion of Mercury question

On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:26:57 GMT, "Sorcerer"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:29:05 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| wrote:


| | Your phasing is out...
| Your ****in' brain is out to lunch, oh great authority on astronomy
| that has never owned a telescope, you ****in' one-liner response jerk
| just as stupid as Hogbin or Cardinale.
|
| I once had full access to a six inch reflector when I worked at the uni.
| but it didn't have a decent tracking system or a camera. I also helped make
| and use a very advanced solar telescope....so I'm not completely without
| experience.
|

Once upon a time long ago...
Did it live happily ever after?

Y'know, gout might be a good reason to swap your golf clubs
for a telescope or a math course.

If you want to see really faint stars you need to increase exposure
time, and because the Earth turns you need a motor and an equatorial
mount.


CAN'T YOU READ?
I just stated that, above. "IT DIDN'T HAVE A DECENT TRACKING SYSTEM"

What do you think of this:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070102.html

I reckon a giraffe walked in front of the lens.


BULL!!!!!

MORE PROOF THAT I AM RIGHT.

THOSE INFRA RED BLOBS ARE MY WCHs...

They are the things that all our variable stars are orbiting......WILSON COOL
HEAVIES......

Even your planet Androcles might be amonst that lot somewhere....