"Stuf4" wrote in message
om...
From Herb Schaltegger:
(Stuf4) wrote:

How ironic that you offer your extrapolation regarding "pretty much
everyone..." while chastising my extrapolation.

This reads as another form of "I'm right/you're wrong", coated with a
heavy tinge of hypocrisy.

And how many posters are publicly supporting your continued games of
semanticism, pedantry, prevarication, equivocation and hand-waving?
None.

But let me guess: the lurkers all support you in email.

Umm, they're not lurking. If you've been following the thread
thoroughly you've seen that Jim Oberg's website has a page that fits
in total agreement with what I've been saying here.

So if, by assumption, Jim agrees with the position I have put forward,
one might ask why he has remained silent. And an obvious follow up is
to ask why others who might agree have remained silent.

Oh BS. Jim and others have never shied away from controversy before. Why
would they do so on THIS issue, but not others?

If anything it's in Jim's interests to elicit controversy as it helps sell
papers. And as a writer, that helps.


~ CT