View Single Post
  #3  
Old September 18th 15, 11:15 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default THE END OF EINSTEIN'S ERA

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029410.900
New Scientist 2013: "Saving time: Physics killed it. Do we need it back? (....) Einstein landed the fatal blow at the turn of the 20th century. According to his special theory of relativity, there is no way to specify events that everyone can agree happen simultaneously. Two events that are both "now" to you will happen at different times for anyone moving at another speed.. Other people will see a different now that might contain elements of yours – but equally might not. "You can define it, but people won't necessarily agree," says physicist Sean Carroll of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. The result is a picture known as the block universe: the universe seen from that impossible vantage point outside space and time. You can by all means mark what you think is "now" with a red dot, but there is nothing that distinguishes that place from any other, except that you are there. Past and future are no more physically distinguished than left and right. There are things that are closer to you in time, and things that are further away, just as there are things that are near or far away in space. But the idea that time flows past you is just as absurd as the suggestion that space does. George Ellis, a cosmologist at the University of Cape Town, South Africa, does not buy any of that. The block universe contradicts every single experience we have, he says."

https://www.newscientist.com/article...wards-in-time/
New Scientist 2015: "[George] Ellis is up against one of the most successful theories in physics: special relativity. It revealed that there's no such thing as objective simultaneity. Although you might have seen three things happen in a particular order – 
A, then B, then C – someone moving 
at a different velocity could have seen 
it a different way – C, then B, then A. 
In other words, without simultaneity there is no way of specifying what things happened "now". And if not "now", what is moving through time? Rescuing an objective "now" is a daunting task."

George Ellis is a high priest in Einsteiniana, and he is "up against one of the most successful theories in physics: special relativity". That's the end of Einstein's era, isn't it?

Pentcho Valev