"Craig Markwardt" wrote in message
...
:
: sean writes:
:
: On 11 Jun, 17:47, Craig Markwardt
: wrote:
: sean writes:
: ...
: Here I use substantiated observations. from MMX and sagnac. Not
: made up imaginary observations as the others do.
: If its compatible with SR then why does SR predict that light cannot
: be constant in a non inertial frame. Yet the MMx, being in a non
: inertial frame observes light being constant in all directions?
:
: Where does the theory of special relativity "predict" that light
: cannot be "constant" in a non-inertial frame? Indeed, it is a
: postulate of SR that the speed of light *is* constant, the same
: constant c, in all inertial frames.
: I never said SR didnt predict it to be c in all inertial frames.
: I said `non inertial frames`.
:
: Since the theory of special relativity doesn't make any predictions
: about non-inertial frames,

it is ****in' useless.


your claim is erroneous, and thus the
: conclusions you draw from it are irrelevant.
:
: CM