On 19/02/2020 3:23 am, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 14:16:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.


There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5


And the relevance of that is?


you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ?

No.


“to operate/use/adopt/have double standards“

from https://www.parolaio.it/dizionario-i...si-due-misure/


I really cannot follow your line of thought.

Is it that since other people have scammed, that makes scamming OK?

Or that the fact that other such proposals have been scams, this must
not be a scam?

Perhaps it's that because a better propulsion system is desirable (which
I don't dispute), anything that proposes one is necessarily real.

Sylvia.