"Greg Neill" schreef in bericht
. ..
wrote in message
oups.com...
1. Does anyone know if the classical calculation of the perihelion of
Mercury accounts for the attraction of the sun by Mercury?

I stumbled on an interesting article that discusses flaws in Newton's
theory, and which suggests that the sun's motion is neglected even for
the most accurate calculations.
It would be surprising if that were true!

2. It also suggests that when taking it into account, the correct
answer may be found. Any ideas if htat could be right?
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/L...pers/gravi.pdf
Regretfully I know nothing about astronomy.

Harald


Attempts to calculate the precession of the perihelion of
Mercury by purely classical means have taken into account any
number of influences, including of course the motion of the
Sun. Newton's theory is completely symmetric when expressed
as differential equations to solve the problem.

100 % Correct.

Newton's theory assumes that gravity act instantaneous.
However if you take into acount that the speed of gravity is
not infinite but equal to 300*c you can correctly simulate
the perihelion precession of Mercury.
For details go to my home page:
http://users.pandora.be/nicvroom/
and study the e-book:
The Reality Now and Understanding.
http://users.pandora.be/nicvroom/now.htm


Amongst the other factors included in "heavy duty" analyses
include the influences of other solar system bodies, and
the oblateness of the Sun due to its rotation.

No amount of fiddling around with classical mechanics can
produce the correct result.

There is no fiddling involved.
To be even more precise:
Within our solair system there is no dark matter.
You do not need MOND.

Nicolaas Vroom