On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 1:03:06 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 2:25:12 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 4:56:12 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:43:22 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 4:28:49 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:

They are both rocky worlds with an atmosphere.

Jupiter is 99%+ gas,


No, Jupiter is mostly liquid.

No, that is incorrect. Once again, you didn't read the links. If your claim is true you should not have any problem supplying your own links in support of your assertion, and understand that assertions are not proof.

and "if" it has a rocky core it is very small. We don't know...yet.

It is not a rocky core. It is the rocky surface of Jupiter.

Unfortunately, I can no longer use my Bull**** Meter since you have fatally overloaded it. Jupiter is almost all clouds. Read the links. Supply your own links of evidence, if you can... but you can't, because you have made this up. Why? I don't know.

And they both have an ocean.

Evidence for an ocean on Jupiter? I don't think so...

All astronomers know Jupiter has an immense ocean of liquid hydrogen.

Incorrect again. Jupiter has a core of 'degenerate' hydrogen, not liquid, there is a huge difference between the 2. If you were actually educated in physics you would certainly know this


Either

you are programmed to oppose me at every corner or you are not very bright.

Probably both. I'm messing with your head and giving you a new perspective on

things.

New perspectives are great and often lead to new theories, but they must be back-up with evidence in the form of experiments and/or observations, which you cannot provide. Your guesses about 'how things are' are simply not true. they are just a figment of your imagination... which also has no place in science.

Both atheists and theists alike are none too swift with different perspectives.

Well, everyone is either a theist or an atheist, and perspective has nothing to offer to science without evidence.

Never mind. I could throw insults back at you but I am not going to. That is

not why I am here.

Asking you show evidence to support your claims is not insulting you. I am almost always offering evidence for the things I claim, which is what virtually every scientist in the world is required to do if his theories are to be taken seriously.

So... why are you here?