On Jun 9, 1:32*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
Will hit in the South Polar Region:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06..._lunar_impact/

Pat

JAXA "KAGUYA"(SELENE), the big impact flop and still nothing Apollo,
but who really cares if our DARPA and NASA have been telling us fibs?

"KAGUYA"(SELENE) encounters our physically dark and extremely dusty
moon at an angle of just 1 degree, and there’s no bounce, skip or
hardly if any gouge, perhaps because the surface of this impact site
was simply way too soft, as in tens of meters deep kind of crystal dry
and electrostatic charged carbonado and basalt dust that’s saturated
in all kinds of local minerals (including sodium) plus countless
meteorite deposits along with their secondary shards.

Lots of terrific private astronomy equipment had to have been pointed
at the carefully specified impact site, with more than enough
resolution and absolutely terrific dynamic range, not to mention the
ten fold better stuff at the disposal of NASA, or the hundred fold
better yet from team KECK, or for that matter the greatly improved
resolution, dynamic range and wide color/hue spectrum capability from
Hubble. Of course at least the HDTV and its full color spectrum via
KAGUYA should have functioned all the way up to a fraction of a second
or a couple frames prior to impact.

And what about all of those better TC (terrain camera) images for the
past 4 months while orbiting at 50 km, of resolution near 5 meters and
exceptional dynamic range?

Thus far we’ve got zip/nada/zilch to look at. Way to go JAXA, ISAS,
NASA and all you other guys.

Here’s an example of what a private astronomer can accomplish.
http://www.avertedimagination.com/moon_1.htm
http://www.avertedimagination.com/latest_1.htm
http://www.avertedimagination.com/im...oon100407.html
http://djsenn.podbean.com/wp-content...on_color_1.jpg

NASA color/hue over-saturated image:
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0602...chedler_35.jpg

Just imagine what our NASA at 10 fold better can do, and KECK at least
100 fold better, as well as each of these images in full/extended
color saturation along with terrific dynamic range so that mineral
elements and any impact created vapors can be easily imaged and
deductively extrapolated. Not to mention the JAXA/Selene X-Ray
fluorescence spectrometer (XRS) and their Gamma ray spectrometer
(GRS). I’m told that Japan has nifty telescopes too, but apparently
theirs are only braille scopes that at best can only detect monochrome
and at **** poor resolution at that. And what about the somewhat
secretive ISRO Chandrayaan-1 mission that’s entirely run by 5th
graders that also can’t quite figure out how the internet works best?

Of course there is always the warm and fuzzy mainstream swarm and
subsequent damage-control gauntlet of our Usenet/newsgroup battery of
brown-nosed clowns, that by rights should know the physics and the
math of observationology science that's perfectly peer replicated,
even by those of their very own kind that sees nothing wrong with
publishing multiple stacked and false colorized eye-candy, of which
their perpetual denials and obfuscation is what clearly makes them
part of the DARPA and NASA ruse/sting of our mutually perpetrated cold-
war century. Everything they've ever contributed is proof positive of
exactly what they are and of who they represent, because not even 5th
grade morons can be that snookered and dumbfounded past the point of
no return.

So, if not playing some part in a complex conspiracy, then why are
these folks telling us such blatant lies upon lies by way of imposing
such obfuscation (excluding evidence), and by otherwise denial and/or
intentionally suggesting otherwise as to what was never the case?

Ever heard of photographic dynamic range?
Ever heard of bandpass optical filters or coated optics?
Ever heard of using the CCD/CMOS imager spectral range?
Ever hear of using PhotoShop or computer extrapolated images?
Would you like to see some amateur color images of our Selene/moon?
Would you like to see planets along with our moon in the same FOV?
Would you like to see our moon, sun and Venus all in the same FOV?

How about sharing a satellite shot (FOV) of our physically dark but
fully illuminated moon along with the absolutely vibrant and bluish
plus unavoidable UV worth of the Sirius star system?

Are they suggesting that our naked Selene/moon is as highly reflective
and otherwise has no viable minerals or unusual elements and thereby
passive as documented by their Apollo missions, and thus insisting
that nothing of this lunar surface or of anything artificial is the
least bit UV reactive or otherwise capable of generating secondary/
recoil photons of any significant color/hue saturation kind?

In other words, do they really expect us to so easily cave in, as
though we outsiders are something less than preschool worthy and
thereby at best village idiots? (because it really seems to be the
case)

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”