"Chosp" wrote in message news:hTHXb.69784$F15.14540@fed1read06...
"Charles Buckley" wrote in message
...

The ET tanks alone costs more than the replacement equipment
for Hubble.

References, please?

Funny about that. I've heard that the ET *and reburshing solid
boosters* cost $114 or so million in 1997.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=co...s.com&rnum= 1

Meanwhile as Chosp mentions in this post, there is $180 million cost
with the replacement equipment for the Hubble telescope.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...com%26rnum%3D1

Sorry about the long Google links. But don't know of a better way to
reference old USENET posts.


Karl Hallowell