N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear Llanzlan Klazmon:

"Llanzlan Klazmon" wrote in message
7.6...

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" N: dlzc1 D:cox
wrote in
news:P1tme.1330$Pp.864@fed1read01:


Dear EL:

SNIP

Hubble expansion has been observed to be occurring between the
Earth and the Moon. Over the last few tens of years. Over
and
above the tidally driven "angular momentum transfer"


Citation please.


URL:http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0302008

David A. Smith





David:

The measurement science involved is no doubt commendable.

The accurate lunar measurements taken or calculated are worth some
interest, and the measurements of the orbital geometry / mechanics are
within the realm of proper science.

I was especially interested in the relationships of the two mases and the
common orbital center.

Application of the Hubble expansion hypothesis is something else.

Any scientific work, however, that doesn't recognize the existence and
function of hydrogen molecules in causing the the apparent Red Shift of
light frequencies is of low grade. Possible explanations involving H2 must
be considered and logically dealt with.

Without H2 it is necessary to first posit that the expansion is occurring,
and to use that idea in the proof that it is occurring. That would be the
legitimizing of the fallacy, post hoc ergo propter hoc, insofar as using
that structure as the test of validity for the ideas proposed; which is wrong.

What would happen if the amount of measured H2 varied in the local solar
and lunar region from time to time. Would the universe have to expand and
contract accordingly?

Fortunately for us the observations did not provide a scientific basis for
measuring any change of the Earth-Luna distance.

H2.

Ralph Hertle