View Single Post
  #5  
Old February 18th 13, 05:28 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Greg \(Strider\) Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 790
Default A different direction after Challenger loss

"JF Mezei" wrote in message
b.com...

On 13-02-17 19:18, bob haller wrote:

The big mistake was freezing the basic design after challenger.


Politicians were told that Shuttle was ready for production instead of a
R&D vehicle that needed more development before production shuttles were
built.

Out of curiosity: would liquid boosters have made a difference to the
foam issue on the ET ? (aka: would the reduced vibration made foam
shedding much less of a problem) ?


No.





--
Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net