View Single Post
  #7  
Old January 28th 13, 01:30 PM posted to sci.space.history
Jeff Findley[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,388
Default The F-1 (well part of it) roars to life

In article , bthorn64
@suddenlink.net says...

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 07:48:00 -0800 (PST), bob haller
wrote:


wouldnt it be something if nasa decided to go back and use the F1
engine on a future booster


You do understand that's the point of this test, right?


Bob doesn't understand much of anything.

I'd really like to see those solids replaced with liquids, especially
since SLS is going to be carrying Orion.

Unfortunately, the development costs of F-1 powered boosters would be
quite a bit higher than the development costs of advanced solid rocket
boosters being proposed by ATK. That and ATK (at least in the past) has
had strong political support. Liquid boosters will unfortunately face a
long, uphill battle.

Jeff
--
"the perennial claim that hypersonic airbreathing propulsion would
magically make space launch cheaper is nonsense -- LOX is much cheaper
than advanced airbreathing engines, and so are the tanks to put it in
and the extra thrust to carry it." - Henry Spencer