On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:07:32 GMT, "Sorcerer"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:13:19 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| wrote:
|

|
| Correct.
|
| | You are going into double imagery.
| | I can produce the same...however it never happens in the real universe because
| | of extinction.
|
|
| V 1493 Aql says it does.
| "Contact binaries" -- a ****ing joke -- says it does.
|
| When you have the velocity S-curve or foldback curve
| and model the spectrum, you'll see one set of lines move
| up and another set move down, looking like two stars.
| DeSitter said we never see two stars when there is only one,
| but we DO.
|
| If that were true, those two stars should appear spontaneously in a bright
| flash and would subsequently move apart and eventually disappear. That process
| should repeat itself.
|
| that is not how a 'contact binary' behaves.....


Do you happen to have a complete 28-year movie of this?
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Crab.gif
I think I saw a spontaneous bright flash at 11:24 pm GMT
on 14th of March 1996, but unfortunately I didn't have my camera
handy to record it.
Oh... wait... You don't even a have a ****ing telescope, but
you know all about how contact binaries behave even when
you can't see them, I forgot you were all-knowing and all-seeing,
O Mighty God, you ****in' ARSEHOLE who gets all his data
second-hand from the world wide web!
You are not, never were and never will be a scientist, you are
forever an arsehole.

Cut the bull, you old dope, be serious for once.

How can you explain the hump in the curves of so-called 'type B cepheids'?..
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//...00425.000.html

As far as I can see it requires a second or third object orbiting at the same
period but with a different eccentricity and YAW angle. There is no known way
for that to happen.

Maybe there are stable orbits in three body systems that allow this.

'Type A cepheids' have the types of curves we cn produce easily.
It would also appear that type B and C cepheids differ only wrt the yaw angle
of the main star.

| I've been waiting seven ****ing years for you to get off your
| arse and model the velocity curve, Wilson, but you are
| ****ing slow and lazy with your head up your arse most of the
| time, you and your ****ing theories. You learnt that from
| Einstein, the worst teacher there ever could be.
| No wonder you ozzies could only farm sheep and goats while
| I was building Concorde. Ozzies, bunch of ****ing dreamers. :-)
|
| All theory, my friend, is gray,
| But green is the lustrous tree of life. -- Mephistopheles, as quoted in Goethe's Faust
| My familiar, Fizz, added that. I'm a sorcerer, y'know. His full name
| is Mephistopheles, Fizz for short. In everyday life he looks just
| like a black cat, but he's a killer. He likes to read my library books,
| and he'll eat me If I don't feed him.
|
| Sounds like he's been well and truly feeding your hangover...or rather,
| drowning it...


At least he doesn't see contact binaries when he's drunk.
Most people manage pink elephants, you are the first I've
ever come across that sees contact binaries, knows how they
behave and are permanently inebriated, insane, and with an
expanded polystyrene ego puffed up like ****in' soap bubble.

Of course they aren't ****ing 'in contact'. That's just what Tussellad thinks.
.....but I doubt very much if they can be explained by double imagery.

See: http://www.astro.utoronto.ca/DDO/res...ries_prog.html

Observed period can certainly be reduced by time compression, by maybe a factor
of four of five.....maybe that is happening here.