View Single Post
  #5  
Old January 4th 07, 07:38 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Sorcerer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 122
Default Perihelion of Mercury question


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:57:58 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| | On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:26:57 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| | wrote:
| |
|
| |
| | Y'know, gout might be a good reason to swap your golf clubs
| | for a telescope or a math course.
| |
| | If you want to see really faint stars you need to increase exposure
| | time, and because the Earth turns you need a motor and an equatorial
| | mount.
| |
| | CAN'T YOU READ?
| | I just stated that, above. "IT DIDN'T HAVE A DECENT TRACKING SYSTEM"
|
| Well, Henri, these are not expensive, y'know:
| http://www.kitkraft.biz/catalog/Cloc...ft-p-4226.html
| Lots of torque, it only turns twice a day. You need another gearbox
| to make it turn once a day.
| http://www.flying-pig.org/fpWeblog/archives/000034.html
|
| If I were a mechanical engineer I'd have one of these.
| http://edwards.web.users.btopenworld...eccanogear.pdf
|
| I suppose being a mere lowly physicist would excuse you...
|
| Don't they have these in Oz?
| http://www.china-manufacturer-direct...ime-switch.jpg
|
| I don't want a telescope. The one we had at uni was pointed for most of the
| time at the nurses quarters of a local hospital.

I can fully understand that. Medical research is very important
and begins with anatomy classes. Why would you give it up?

|
| I can get all the info I need from the 'net.

Jeery's third hand crap with velocity and luminosity
showing the wrong phase? No wonder you are struggling.


|
| | What do you think of this:
| | http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070102.html
| |
| | I reckon a giraffe walked in front of the lens.
| |
| | BULL!!!!!
|
| Ok, it was a bull giraffe. I can't tell males from females just
| by looking at part of the neck.
|
|
| |
| | MORE PROOF THAT I AM RIGHT.
| |
| | THOSE INFRA RED BLOBS ARE MY WCHs...
|
| Cool, I didn't know WCHs were 100 to 1000 light years in diameter.
|
| What do you think accounts for all that DARK MATTER.

Santa Claus, perhaps?
I didn't know there was any dark matter, the last I heard galaxies
were spinning too fast because astronomers didn't understand
Wilson time, so they invented more mass to account for it.
You don't understand the importance of Wilson time, old pal.
Wilson time is your greatest discovery, you ruin it with WCHs.
Let's get serious and discuss this further now that you can model
velocities. What is the difference between this set of velocity curves?

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/VC.gif

I've only changed ONE parameter for all them.
You already have the clue with your own actual and apparent
velocity curve.


|
| | They are the things that all our variable stars are orbiting......WILSON COOL
| | HEAVIES......
|
| Yeah, big, aren't they, considering the grey blobs are
| supposed to be star clusters in the foreground. Definitely god-sized.
| I still reckon it's a cow or bull giraffe walking in front of the lens, though.
|
| No. It's WCHs, somewhat out of focus..
|
|
| | Even your planet Androcles might be amonst that lot somewhere....
|
| Nah, Androcles isn't much bigger than Jupiter.
|
| It would be if it was all puffed up like foam polystyrene.
|