"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message ...
| On 24 Dec 2006 16:31:24 -0800, "Jerry" wrote:
|
| Henri Wilson wrote:
| On 23 Dec 2006 16:16:17 -0800, "Jerry" wrote:
|
| Henri Wilson wrote:
| On 22 Dec 2006 16:03:58 -0800, "Jerry" wrote:
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| "Jerry" wrote in message ups.com...
| | Koobee Wublee wrote:
| | On Dec 21, 6:17 pm, "
| | wrote:
|
|
| (double yawn)
| Why don't you do something useful, like compute Cepheid Variable
| Velocity graphs for RT Aurigae using your ballistic theory, and prove
| that your graphs are consistent with your brightness graphs.
|
| I have produced these curves.
| see: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/rtaurc.jpg
|
| Not a bad fit, eh Jeery?
|
| Where are your predicted Doppler shifts = radial velocity curves?
|
| Totally unimpressive.
| With enough free parameters, you can fit anything to anything.
| You need to show that you can explain ALL the data.
|
| You can't get out of it that easily Jerry.
| The basic maths is limited to the use of c+v.cos(theta) only. The parameters I
| can change wont make any difference to the range of basic shapes I can produce.
|
| Where are your predicted Doppler shifts = radial velocity curves?
|
| I have shown them before.
|
|
| Cepheid curves are typical of stars in moderately eccentric orbits with their
| major axes lying about 45 degres away fronm the LOS.
|
| It so happens that the current view of these 'huff-puff' stars might also give
| a similar brightness curve, based on the variable c+v of their surface facing
| Earth..
|
| So I win either way.
|
| Where are your predicted Doppler shifts = radial velocity curves?
|
| I have shown them before.
|
| I have the radial velocity curves as well...also a perfect fit.
|
| Where are your predicted Doppler shifts = radial velocity curves?
|
| I have shown them before.
|
| Then why don't you show your radial velocity curves and the
| brightness curves on a single set of plots?
|
| I did once before.
| I can't find it now.
|
| Uh, huh...
|
| I have shown them before.
|
| The radial velocity curves are exactly those of a star with the above
| parameters.
| However there was a great deal of doubt as to the actual phasing between the
| published brightness and velocity curves. This was admitted by the author.
|
| Uh huh...
|
| Try this set of curves:
| http://mb-soft.com/public2/cepheid.html
|
| THat's the one to which I just referred you.

That diagram is as poor as ****, unreadable, scanned straight out of
a text book.

The fit in THIS curve is pure bloody guesswork:
http://mb-soft.com/public2/cepheid9.gif

The REAL data:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...k/RTAurVel.GIF

And the DERIVED data is idiotic:

"The acceleration information for the entire cycle can be found by differentiating the velocity graph by time. "

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...urVelCheat.GIF

The acceleration goes up while the velocity goes down?
No way, Jose!

| Simultaneously match the Doppler shift (radial velocity) curve
| and the brightness curve of RT Aurigae.


I want to see JEERY simultaneously match the Doppler shift (radial velocity) curve
and the brightness curve of RT Aurigae.


| I have shown them before.

H, let the cartoon cat and mouse team Tom and Jeery do it, the lying phuckwits.
I want to see the brightness PHASE matched to the velocity phase, or
the JULIAN DATE matched to the velocity curve. That crucial data is ALWAYS
missing.
Why?
I'll tell you why. They are NOT in phase as the cheating idiots pretend.

The gif at http://mb-soft.com/public2/cepheid6.gif is FAKED.

C Johnson, Physicist, Physics Degree from Univ of Chicago is yet another incompetent moron who can't even get the sign of the acceleration correct, like you and your **** the '-'.

Who the **** would use DERIVED data?

Androcles.