Two famous hypnotists in Einstein's schizophrenic world, Neil deGrasse Tyson and Brian Greene, mercilessly brainwash the gullible public:

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ry?id=32191481
Neil deGrasse Tyson: "We have ways of moving into the future. That is to have time tick more slowly for you than others, who you return to later on. We've known that since 1905, Einstein's special theory of relativity, which gives the precise prescription for how TIME WOULD SLOW DOWN FOR YOU if you are set into motion."

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmnLmwBmfE
Brian Greene: "If you're moving relative to somebody else, time for you slows down."

Einstein's relativity predicts the opposite - the (validly deducible) conclusion from Einstein's 1905 postulates is that time SPEEDS UP for the moving observer. As this observer checks stationary clocks against his own (moving) clocks, he finds that the stationary clocks are slow and accordingly his own (moving) clocks are FAST:

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf
David Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. [...] For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow..."

http://topquark.hubpages.com/hub/Twin-Paradox
"The situation is that a man sets off in a rocket travelling at high speed away from Earth, whilst his twin brother stays on Earth. [...] ...the twin in the spaceship considers himself to be the stationary twin, and therefore as he looks back towards Earth he sees his brother ageing more slowly than himself."

Again: Special relativity predicts that time SPEEDS UP for the moving observer. Neil deGrasse Tyson and Brian Greene know that but teach that time SLOWS DOWN for the moving observer. The brainwashed public is hopelessly confused: SPEEDING UP is false (moving clocks and stationary clocks tick at the same rate) but at least it validly follows from the postulates. Brainwashing becomes much more efficient if the validly deducible falsehood, SPEEDING UP, is replaced with its alternative, SLOWING DOWN, which is non sequitur.

Do Neil deGrasse Tyson and Brian Greene believe in both falsehoods, SPEEDING UP and SLOWING DOWN? Yes. They know what relativity really predicts but accept the alternative as well (George Orwell calls this "doublethink"). Similarly, Bingo the Clowno knows his real name but he also believes that his name is Bingo:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX5ajyPr96M
Bingo the Clowno

In other words, Neil deGrasse Tyson and Brian Greene are both brainwashers and victims of brainwashing.

Here is a clear example of the conversion of rational people into thoughtless Bingos: Initially Joe Wolfe's students are sure that the speed of light cannot be the same for differently moving observers but in the end all of them get the name Bingo the Einsteiniano:

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einstein...eird_logic.htm
Joe Wolfe: "At this stage, many of my students say things like "The invariance of the speed of light among observers is impossible" or "I can't understand it". Well, it's not impossible. It's even more than possible, it is true. This is something that has been extensively measured, and many refinements to the Michelson and Morley experiment, and complementary experiments have confirmed this invariance to very great precision. As to understanding it, there isn't really much to understand. However surprising and weird it may be, it is the case. It's the law in our universe. The fact of the invariance of c doesn't take much understanding."

Pentcho Valev