On Mar 12, 7:49*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/12/13 9:46 AM, Brad Guth wrote:

Your conditional laws of physics are noted, as is your faith-based Big
Bang.

* *Tests of Big Bang Cosmology

* *The Big Bang Model is supported by a number of important
* *observations, each of which are described in more detail
* *on separate pages:

* *1. The expansion of the universe
*http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_exp.html

* *Edwin Hubble's 1929 observation that galaxies were generally
* *receding from us provided the first clue that the Big Bang
* *theory might be right.

* *2. The abundance of the light elements H, He, Li
*http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_ele.html

* *The Big Bang theory predicts that these light elements should
* *have been fused from protons and neutrons in the first few
* *minutes after the Big Bang.

* *3. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation
*http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_cmb.html

* *The early universe should have been very hot. The cosmic
* *microwave background radiation is the remnant heat leftover
* *from the Big Bang.

* *These three measurable signatures strongly support the notion
* *that the universe evolved from a dense, nearly featureless
* *hot gas, just as the Big Bang model predicts.

Cosmic time is not relative to our extremely limited existence.

You and others of your mainstream closed mindset kind can't even tell
us what year Earth got its seasonal tilt or the Arctic ocean basin.
In fact, you can't hardly explain anything of how humans even came to
be.

The only cosmic things proven lately is that the universe and our puny
galaxy are anything but consistent or in any way unified. At least so
far, there's not even an identical star to that of our sun.