"Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker (zili@home)" wrote in message ...
Am 6 Feb 2004 15:03:21 -0800 schrieb "Guth/IEIS~GASA":

Some small corrections about the Apollo Hasselblads:
image format 55*55mm (shot on 70mm film) between 150 and 180 images
per magazine, depending on film type. And now a listing of used
lenses:
focal length (mm) view angle (degrees)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Biogon 4.5/38 38 90
Biogon 5.6/60 60 65
Planar 2.8/80 80 52
Planar 3.5/100 100 43
UV-Sonnar 4.3/105 105 41
Sonnar 5.6/250 250 17
Tele-Tessar 8/500 500 8.5



cu, ZiLi aka HKZL (Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker)

Since there's no lunar atmosphere, just a few of those micrometorites
incoming every hour or so (plus loads of inbound dust bunnies at
perhaps 10km/s), thus essentially nothing sufficiently filtering out
the truly horrific UV spectrum. I'm wonderwing which if any UV filters
were applied, and/or included within those lenses (such as the
"UV-Sonnar 4.3/105")?

I did NOT write, that all these types of optics were used on moon's
surface. In fact was only the Biogon 60 used there; all other lenses
were dedicated for use in the CM or while space EVAs. E.g. the
UV-Sonnar was dedicated for astro-photographics, or the Tele-Tessar
for surveillance purpose out of orbit...



cu, ZiLi aka HKZL (Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker)

Thanks for your feedback. So, therefore no UV filters were applied to
the Biogon 5.6/60?


Regards, Brad Guth / IEIS~GASA