View Single Post
  #11  
Old December 31st 08, 03:32 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Stuf4
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 554
Default New Columbia loss report out today

From M :

http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/298870main_SP-2008-565.pdf

It is the most detail accident report I have ever read in my life. I
had access to Air Force accident reports while I was in the service,
and I read AW&ST accident reports on airline accidents. This report is
very very detailed.


The Air Force doesn't do it and the FAA doesn't do it because it is a
pointless waste of effort. This NASA report is astoundingly
ludicrous. Columbia's wing came off in a region of the envelope that
was *way* outside of anywhere that was known to be survivable. Why
would anyone need a separate standalone report detailing how the crew
died? Published almost 6! years after the fact, no less. What's
next, NASA? How bout a timely 500 page analysis on exactly how
Geoffrey de Havilland died. Inquiring minds NEED to know! Be sure to
include the serial number of the panel that initially entered his left
temporal lobe, as well as all other pieces of hardware that had the
potential to become lodged into his cranium. Do the simulated
analysis of the forward cockpit dynamics as his jet disintegrated.
Then cite the intriguing fact that even if his body had not become
impaled, then he would have flailed to death by q-bar loads. And if
he had not become impaled or flailed to death, then he would have died
by drinking in the Thames. How is it that we've gone over 60 years
without this crucial study being funded with millions of taxpayer
dollars and the findings made public (so his family can soak in the
juicy details too)?

For STS-107, the crew had no hope of survival. SCSIIT asks, "What
events occurred that had lethal potential for the crew, even after the
crew became deceased?"

How's this for a major epiphany... If you don't design your
spacecraft with any way for your crew to survive a huge range of
mishaps, when those mishaps occur then the crew is expected to die.
So what was NASA trying to accomplish by burning all those boot
soles? Shuttle forebody dynamics simulation using Apollo capsule
damping moments?! With this embarrassing report, NASA has hit an all-
time low. How ironic for this to be released at the 40th anniversary
of one of the greatest accomplishments that NASA (or the human race at
large) ever did.

I will not be surprised if Obama pushes to dismantle NASA because of
its current state of buffoonery, exemplified by this "Crew Survival"
report.


~ CT