View Single Post
  #13  
Old July 6th 04, 09:59 AM
Marcel Luttgens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SR time dilation on remote objects ?

Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote in message ...
Marcel Luttgens wrote:
SR time dilation on remote objects ?

Question:

Can time be "SR dilated" on remote galaxies or supernovae, because
of space expansion?


No. Apparent time dilation due to space expansion has nothing to
do with the time dilation of SR.


What do you mean by "apparent"? Is it such time expansion or not?

Anyhow, explaining the assumed time dilation by SR or by GR doesn't
change the fact the space expansion acts symmetrically, meaning
that somebody on Earth *cannot* observe such dilation. Claiming
that space expansion gives a time dilation redshift is simply wrong.
Only a Doppler shift can be observed.


Details are given hereafter, as well as the refusal by the
moderator to post my question in sci.physics.research


Perhaps because you could read this up yourself if you would
bother to actually open a book on cosmology? I recommend
"The early universe" by Kolb&Turner.


This is a good example of crooked debating.


Marcel Luttgens

_______


Date : 04/07/04 15:18
To : "Urs Schreiber"

Object : SR Time dilation on supernovae ?

Dear Urs Schreiber,

I am not "saying that contemporary cosmology and GR are fundamentally
wrong", I prove it.


You prove nothing like that. You even don't know what modern
cosmology says. E.g., you didn't know that the Hubble parameter
is time dependent even during quite ordinary expansion!


The Hubble constant is determined by the mean density of the
universe.
Instead of just claiming that it is time dependent, you should
better show the formula, and simultaneously explain why the
assumed space expansion is not symmetrical for all observers.


Why don't you allow experts to disprove my
demonstration?


Because they have better things to do than to correct your
elementary misconceptions about the Big Bang theory?


The Big Bangers are those which are full of misconceptions.
The BB theory is riddled with ad hoc patches.


Science doesn't deserve censorship.


The newsgroup sci.physics.research is reserved for genuine
research. Banning people who have elementary misconceptions, like
you, has nothing to do with censorship.


[snip]


Bye,
Bjoern


Marcel Luttgens