View Single Post
  #9  
Old December 29th 15, 11:24 PM posted to alt.astronomy
palsing[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,068
Default Flight 93 Crash Sight -Hole was already there.

On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 2:55:48 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
palsing wrote:
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 12:40:08 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
"palsing" wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 7:31:52 AM UTC-8, Bast wrote:
palsing wrote:

People on the streets that day saw NO passenger jets.
....They made that clear to reporters..

9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological
Operation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM

Refute this, you stupid idiot...

https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7li...untsofthenycai





So ? you think a homemade website is a credible source ?

You are really going to love some of the flat earth stuff

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies

And it's on wikopedia, so it MUST be true, huh ?

I'm sorry I hurt your feelings when I called you stupid. I thought you
already knew...

And can you get back to the subject or at least try?

Fact is what we saw ram the Twin Towers is consistent with CGIs in
that they never slowed down on impact, they didn't lose any parts on
impact and some of them lost wings while in flight just like CGIs that
have been programmed to reflect the sky do and did.


There are plenty of photos and videos to prove otherwise. Get a
freakin' life.

Didn't lose any parts on impact? Really?

http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...hullpiece.html



http://www.911research.wtc7.net/plan...ndinggear.html

These sure look like valid photos to me, you gullible fool...

http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit_photos.html

I would call you stupid, too, but everyone already knows that. If you
had a brain in your head you would probably take it out and play with
it...






Uh,....why are you showing PLANE PARTS,....the the alleged debris from WTC 7
???
All your links have WTC7 specifically mentioned.

Pssst,.....the official 9/11 fairytale say no planes hit WTC 7,....so for
kripes sakes be quiet or Bast and Rocky and the rest of the world will be
laughing at you.
.....OOPS TOO LATE


Although the links all contain "WTC7" that does not guarantee that everything on those pages refer to WTC7

You ignorant moron, did you only look at the pictures and fail to read any of the descriptions? For example...

"This photograph of debris on the roof of WTC 4 shows a fragment of the hull of the jetliner that crashed into the South Tower (Flight 175)."

"These photographs show remains of an engine that passed through the South Tower, resting at the corner of Church and Murray Streets."

"The first photograph shows a portion of Flight 11's landing gear... at the corner of West and Rector Streets, about four blocks south of the North Tower."

No one claims a plane hit WTC 7, but it clearly suffered much damage from the fall of WTC 1.

The links I provided merely scratch the surface, there are hundreds and hundreds more. Never learned how to search the internet properly?

BTW, that video you linked, "9/11 No Planes Used - Witnesses Proof Theory - Your Psychological Operation" was unbelievably simple-minded and intelligently assembled, I can't imagine anyone with more than 3 or 4 brain cells believing much of anything therein.