View Single Post
  #16  
Old October 9th 16, 04:03 PM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default Falcon 9 anomaly not related to FTS

On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 8:13:48 AM UTC+13, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote:

On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 12:08:39 AM UTC+13, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 1:51:26 PM UTC+12, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article ,
says...

SpaceX today released a preliminary determination that the 'anomaly'
was caused by "a large breach in the cryogenic helium system of the
second stage liquid oxygen tank". They are looking for what could
have caused that.

There ain't no FTS in there, so the FTS couldn't have caused this.
Those who latched onto the FTS as the 'cause' and wouldn't let go (to
the point of claiming things that they couldn't substantiate) should
hang their heads in shame.

Yep.

Not sure why you felt the need to keep supporting your position that the
FTS was the cause, because it wasn't.


Beause of the location nature and timing of the explosion indicated very possibly the FTS.


No. It was because you're stupid and convinced that you can't ever
possibly be wrong about anything due to your mental illness.


Wait a minute, you obviously didn't read the comment I made stating specifically I was wrong about the FTS originally? How do you conclude from a bald statement from someone they were wrong that they have a mental illness that precludes them from accepting they are ever wrong? (if that is indeed a mental illness - do you have a citation on that?)

Get help...


You certainly need it. Others, not so much.



--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine