nightbat wrote

Bill Sheppard wrote:

From NB:

...my model lends to observation
confirmation and/or nullification, while
Officer oc's for Wolter's depends on
beyond observable Universe
dependence, non observable reality, or
nullable imaginary based model.


Admittedly, Wolter's CBB model depends on intuitive extrapolation(IE),
that is, deducing the nature of the unseen from a
pattern/principle/planform seen consistently and universally throughout
nature, and presuming the unseen is more likely to embody that same
pattern/principle/planform, than not.

The minute you recognize space for what it is, a dynamic,
sub-Planck-wavelength field of stupendous energy density and
hydrodynamic pressure, the next question must invariably arise: What
manner of 'Engine' is capable of driving and sustaining so energetic a
Field? What sort of 'compressor' and Master Oscillator rings out the
'tones' whose sub-harmonics give rise to the Periodic Table? The CBB
model with its centerpiece Primal Particle provides just that
'Engine'/compressor/'Master Oscillator'.

Very much like String theory...


Nay, nyet. While string theory does posit some sort of vibrational
underpinning, it remains clueless as to the 'Engine' driving it. Also,
it depends on ad hockery such as 'eleven dimensions' to try to
mathematicavlly unify gravity and the strong nuclear force under the
VSP. It depicts gravity some sort of emanation from those 'higher
dimensions'. The dynamic is no different than geocentrism's use of
'epicycles' - applying perfectly good math to try to validate a false
premise.

...needing more and more dimensions,
branes, and Universes to try to close the
loop but without plus/negative
confirmable evidence for same.


Yep. More and more fixes, fudges and kludges.

Whereas the CBB model needs no such ad hockery. Without ever holding
unification as an objective, it seamlessly unifies gravity and the SNF.
It unifies relativity and QM. It explains the mechanism of gravity and
gravity-accereration equivalence. It provides the next
expansion/extension of special relativity to include _density frames_ of
the spatial medium, holding c constant in all density frames just as SR
holds it constant in all inertial frames. It explains 'c-dilation' as
the drop in lightspeed _as observed from the external frame_ across the
expansion of the universe, with c remaining fixed *locally* in the
absence of any density gradient. No constants are ever violated, not the
Lorentz invariance, the fine structure constant, the lightspeed
constant, or any other constant. And the CBB model doesn't require any
'higher dimensions' beyond our familiar three. It simply replaces the
'Void' with the SPED and one primal Flow driven by one Force.

With its numerous sidebars providing so much collaboration and
corroboration while explaining the one simple mechanism behind all of
physical reality, and without needing one iota of math to do it, what if
perhaps the CBB model really *is* true?

oc


nightbat

Well since no one else even comes close to presenting a viable
premise for closing the gravitational loop for field unity, it's
debatable. That Darla however has taken favor with you Officer oc is
interesting while respecting the nightbat's friendship and authority.

respectfully,
the nightbat