On Jan 30, 9:55*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24 2009, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:

On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted..

Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.

At least I still believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.

Can you or others of your cabal explain how those Newtonian laws of
gravity do not apply in this case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few million others that never manage to
orbit the sun)?

Tell us again how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated
with the nearby Sirius star/solar system. (especially when it was worth
12.5 Ms, and before then as a molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms)

Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity that excludes
items of interstellar distances?

According to those pesky Newtonian laws of gravity, our solar system
is well within the dominate tidal radii influence of Sirius, and
especially tidal binding because we're not receding from one another.

I still wonder why our resident Zionists/Jews that seem to only post
their kosher approved tripe in alt.astronomy, as such are always so
steadfast naysay about our physically dark but nifty mineral saturated
moon, the planet Venus that shows signs of intelligent other life, and
especially peeved about anything related to the relatively nearby
Sirius star/solar system, that which our solar system is clearly tidal
linked. *If I didn't know any better, I'd say they have something
faith-based at risk or simply dark and scary to hide.

What kinds of planets and their moons would a massive (18e30 kg star
that rather quickly consumed itself down to a mass of 6e30 kg as a
red supergiant) as such an extremely vibrant star like Sirius(B) have
had?

~ BG