View Single Post
  #3  
Old February 11th 10, 06:28 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Rick Jones[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 587
Default COTS-CRS price-per-ton-to-ISS is OVER FOUR TIMES HIGHER than ?Shuttle

gaetanomarano wrote:
---
Shuttle: launch cost $600M, payload 24 tons max (+7 astronauts) = $25M
per ton to ISS
---
Falcon/Dragon: COTS+CRS funds to SpaceX $2.1 Bn / 20 tons (and ZERO
astronauts) = $105M per ton to the ISS


If you are going to include the non-recurring costs of Falcon/Dragon
in the per-ton figures, you need also to include the non-recurring
costs of Shuttle.

http://www.spacex.com/falcon9.php suggests their contract with NASA
was for a minimum of 12 flights. (And claims 1.6 billion). With an
option to order additional flights to 3.1 billion.

rick jones
--
denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, rebirth...
where do you want to be today?
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...