Thread: R.I.P. Mars One
View Single Post
  #9  
Old February 17th 19, 01:16 AM posted to sci.space.policy
David Spain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,901
Default R.I.P. Mars One

On 2/15/2019 4:50 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
BTW, just because folks sign releases up the wazoo, doesn't mean those
left behind can't or won't sue their carrier. We've seen this time and
again with "settlements" arranged after some tragic airline mishap.


OK, name the airlines that have been sued out of existence by grieving
relatives.


It's a bit of a stretch to compare airlines to Mars One no?


Sometimes these suits are often brought by insurance companies
themselves trying to re-coup losses on life insurance policies that
don't exclude air travel for example. In this case its insurance
companies vs insurance companies.


OK, name the airlines that have been sued out of existence by grieving
insurance companies.


Not my words. Insurance companies routinely do this, it's a standard
business practice. Usually doesn't even go to court. An airline would
not be at risk because they've been indemnified by their insurance
carrier, that's why they have insurance no?



My take is Mars One was ill-considered from the get go.


My take is that it was within a hairs breadth of being fraud. Where
did the money go?


That's a great question.


That it died
from poor organization before it got anyone killed is to its credit
actually. It would almost certainly would have had to deal with a
carrier such as SpaceX or Blue Origin to achieve its goal.


Yet it apparently had no plans to do either and was promising trips to
Mars before either of those companies would have vehicles.


Why the middle man?


Because they can take the money, deliver nothing, and then declare
bankruptcy.

Excellent point. Caveat emptor.


Maybe once Mars flights are more common ...


You mean 'more common' as in 'exist'?


Touche. Yes.



... a Mars One type
"colony" company can responsibly contract flights for carriers to get
their "communities" established, with even return capability if
something goes majorly wrong. Time will tell.


Perhaps, but they will be organizations that have some working
relationship with people who can actually deliver boosters and
vehicles and actual plans for sending people and equipment. Mars One
had none of that.



Agreed, completely.