The presentation of a traveling axis which stretches through the
center of the Earth from Arctic to Antarctic circles can be set up
like the normal arrangement of longitudes associated with daily
rotation however there are no variations in latitudinal speeds to
consider as this cycle to the central Sun is an extension and
attribute of the orbital motion.

I do not see why a person with graphical talents cannot create the
necessary product before overlaying daily rotational meridians on
orbital meridians and it is almost certain that many things which are
locked out by the dismal addiction to right ascension.

The Equatorial ring of Uranus acts like a natural orbital meridian
with the traveling axis running in a line roughly from Equator to
Equator so that the ring turns through 360 degrees in over 8
decades,the fact that readers can actually see it turning to the
central Sun should provide enough support for the first creative
individual skilled in graphics to present the Earth's equivalent
orbital axis with a meridian or meridians attached -

http://astro.berkeley.edu/~imke/Infr..._2001_2005.jpg

While the daily rotational coordinates on Uranus are about 90 degrees
off the traveling orbital axis,the Earth's is 23 1/2 degrees so that
really the polar coordinates represent a planet's orbital
characteristics in its purest state,hence in the absence of daily
rotation,all locations on Earth would experience a single daylight/
darkness cycle.

Why the opposition to an additional orbital feature which is crucial
to explain the seasons and variations in natural noon when allied with
daily rotation ?.