\(formerly\)" dlzc1.cox@net wrote in message news:4CV2b.17462$Qy4.1808@fed1read05...
Dear Aleksandr Timofeev:

"Aleksandr Timofeev" wrote in message
om...
\(formerly\)" dlzc1.cox@net wrote in message
news:xoy1b.8759$Qy4.7694@fed1read05...
...
Unbound electrons, Alexsandr. It might be like stopping a bus with a
fly,
but it should be able to be done.

Dear David, I have difficulties with physical interpretation
of your thoughts.

You and me both.

Please explain your thoughts more detail.

---electrons--- ---photons---
And the interesting and possibly detectable interactions would be with an
angle between the two beams.

It is promising and delightful idea.
For practical embodying of this idea,
probably, you can utillize a X-ray laser and electron beam
inside a cathode tube.

I do NOT know if this has been done.

It is promising and delightful idea.
As result you will probably have a very effective frequency
transformer of a X-rays with smoothly varying retuning of frequency...
It will be outbreak in new high technologies...

I do NOT know if this has EVER resulted in a detectable interaction.

It is promising and delightful idea.
It will be outbreak in new high technologies...
Can be...?

...
Done. Laser into an electron beam. Don't know if its been done, don't
know if a measureable result has been looked for. But an example.

The laser beam has too much individually of indistinguishable photons...
???

Ever look at the spoons in a drawer? They all tend to nest together.

But they do not interreact with each other ABSOLUTELY,
or i.e. they do not interreact almost absolute basically.

Photons are not like this. If they were, lasers would be easier. And they
would not dissipate (as they do for LLR measurements).

Lasers are like traffic lights (or better still, like traffic circles),
that release a batch of photons with the "noses" of the little "cars" all
lined up (within reason).

Dear David, I have difficulties with physical interpretation
of your thoughts again. Please explain your thoughts more detail.

What is the physical reason of a dispersing of photons?


To quote Uncle Al, you don't know if you don't look.

It is rather sad. I have lost confidence to expert
estimations of the physicochemical Uncle Al after his
fantastic and sci-fi verbiages

about GPS's precision.

He did not look at weight relations of errors of GPS's
constituents, but he is sure that the Fly sitting on
the Elephant determines a precision weight of composite System
" the Elephant - Fly ".


(And we may have
looked and found nothing.)

On what you do a hint?

David A. Smith