View Single Post
  #1  
Old December 28th 15, 11:17 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Is Einstein's Relativity Science?

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...heory-science/
Is String Theory Science? - Scientific American

http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswi...s-not-science/
Why String Theory Is Not A Scientific Theory - Forbes

Is Einstein's relativity science? The answer is no:

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf
Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, David Morin, Cambridge University Press, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. (...) For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow, but enough strangeness occurs during the turning-around period to make A end up older. Note, however, that a discussion of acceleration is not required to quantitatively understand the paradox..."

The above multiple absurdity cannot be produced by a SCIENTIFIC theory.

Pentcho Valev