View Single Post
  #4  
Old October 17th 16, 12:45 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,346
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.

In sci.physics Serigo wrote:
On 10/16/2016 8:25 AM, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article ,
says...


In sci.physics Jeff Findley wrote:
In article ,

says...

In sci.physics Jeff Findley wrote:
In article ,

says...

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:

snip


return ship can produce liquid methane and LOX from the CO2 atmosphere
and H2 brought on the ship. If we end up going that route, just keep
leaving nuclear reactors on Mars brought from earth on the transport
ships.

Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however
that is not going to be cheap.


Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap".
Progress!


liar. YOU have not shown, nor demonstrated, that it is possible.


It is obviously possible to transport a reactor to Mars.

The question is how is it to be done; lots of small assembled reactors,
large reactors in pieces, something in between?

Likely one would want to ship the fuel separately, perhaps all in one
shipment to minimize the red tape of putting nuclear material on a rocket.


--
Jim Pennino