captain. wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:ef1e6bcc620f386c664f803c5a55fcba.49644@mygate .mailgate.org...
"captain." wrote in message
news:0lvMg.787$bf5.127@edtnps90

hmmm, i'm impressed that you knew that twink. good work!

How absolutely silly

does absolute silliness have a numerical value?

of yourself, and proof-positive of what rusemasters
you folks actually are.


well yes, the twinker and myself are behind the plot to convince the public
that the moon is migrating outwards with each passing year. we almost had
you all fooled.

Before we blindly leap ourselves onto our moon (for the first time),
perhaps we should think again. You folks have got to be absolutely
kidding about utilizing the physically dark surface of our extremely
dusty and highly reactive moon, especially for much of anything that's
on behalf of optical astronomy.


aren't you the guy who thinks there should be a colony on venus? now that's
crazy!

Why is it cracy? There are only a limited amount of living space on
this planet Earth. At the rate earth's population is growing, we
should set our sight into Venus or Mars. Our scientists today should
be studying these planets to see how we can make it liveable for human
beings.


At best, the LL-1 zone (60,000 km away from the moon) is relatively
clean of debris and perhaps far enough away from that nasty moon of
our's in order to humanly survive the combined solar/cosmic/moon TBI
dosage, but that's only if well enough shielded by a few meters of
water.

Our moon's surface is highly if not entirely exposed to solar wind
driven electrostatics and otherwise being that of a naked anticathode
environment that's rather solar/cosmic and locally DNA lethal (far worse
off than anything Van Allen belt related), plus continually and
unavoidably running itself into stuff at 30+ km/s, and otherwise gravity
attracting upon all that's nearby, is perhaps good for the sorts of
robust robotics of those tough little SAR image receiving modules, but
otherwise hardly suited for that of anything optical or otherwise
end-user-friendly unless it's going deep underground.

Do any of you folks even realize what absolutely terrific resolution a
given focal length of 384,000 km can do on behalf SAR imaging? (I didn't
think so)


we'll look into it right away sir!@

Such pure robotics on behalf of accomplishing such extended SAR/VLA
imaging is actually based upon extremely efficient deployments of what
should not represent 10% of a given Apollo mission, and/or perhaps not
even involving 1% the mass per SAR image receiving module, and without
folks ever having to endure the trauma as to what that sort of nasty
lunar surface environment would otherwise be nailing countless strands
of human DNA per second.

Of course the regular laws of physics and I could be entirely wrong. In
which case, how much DNA trauma and/or physical impact trauma can a
human or that of anything optical withstand?
-
Brad Guth


it's not something that i consider on a daily basis.