On Sep 26, 8:22*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote:
On Sep 26, 4:01*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote:
On Sep 25, 7:23*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote:
On Sep 24, 10:31*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote:
On Sep 23, 10:50*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote:
On Sep 22, 9:49*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote:
On Sep 21, 9:29*pm, Howard Brazee wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:11:19 -0700 (PDT), William Mook

wrote:
And it was *NOT* an answer to the question you were asked.

Yes it was. *Howard asked when have extrapolations ever worked in the
real world. *I answered, Moore's Law. *End of debate.

I intended to say "So when has that type of extrapolation ever worked
out in real life?". * *Which is not the same thing.

"That type of extrapolation" is one that doesn't end - immortality is
beyond extrapolation - it is infinite.

So you answered a question that is different from the one I asked,
which is why there continues to be a debate, despite your observation
to the contrary.

Well, I read it differently. *

Yes, we know you did. *I tried to explain to you what he meant, but
you would have none of that and simply responded in your usual mode of
ignoring what was said and blathering off on your own.

I'm convinced that you are indeed suffering from some mental defect or
disease that prevents you from understanding the context in which
things are said, given your virtual 100% record of insisting on
incorrectly interpreting things people say.

No, Fred, I read it the only way it made sense. *You twisted it into a
way to make rude comments about me my capabilities and my ideas.

Yes, I 'twisted' it to mean WHAT HOWARD HAS SAID WAS WHAT HE MEANT.

Says you Freddie. *Let Howard speak for himself.

He has.

is a prime example of the disconnect from reality you suffer
from.

Stop it Freddie. *Stop it right now.

**** off, Mookie. ***** off right now.

I'm not the one engaging in dangerous behaviors Freddie, you are. *I'm
just warning you that if you cannot control your violent hateful
temper, it will be the end of you. *That's all.

More death threats from Mr Mook.

I didn't threaten you Freddie, I'm saying there is a correlation
between those that are violent and hateful on line and bad things
happening to them. * *So, take note Freddie. *It is very likely to
happen to you!

http://www.crime-research.org/library/Jeanne.htm

You've got a great future in the protection rackets, Mookie. *"I'm not
threatening you, but if you don't buy 'insurance' from me the place
might catch fire..."

Law enforcement isn't as stupid as you think they are. *And I'm not a
teenager.

I never said law enforcement was stupid. *I said law enforcement would
look at the nature of your complaint and the facts and conclude you
were a loon. *You ACT like *a teenager. *Maybe like most teens you're
not getting laid enough. *Maybe that would explain why you're so
spiteful.

This from the guy who flips out and starts spitting venom while
publicly admitting that he's so worked up OVER USENET that he HATES
someone.

Yeah, another example of the vast intellect and mental and emotional
stability of Mr William Mook...

--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
*only stupid."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine

Now now, quit putting words in my mouth. I said based on your hateful
and spiteful and unremitting attacks of me, my ideas and capabilities
I have come to hate you and its something I'd rather not do.