View Single Post
  #5  
Old August 27th 07, 12:23 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
q-bit
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default THREE FRAUDS THAT KILLED PHYSICS

"Jeckyl" wrote
"Androcles" wrote
"Pentcho Valev" wrote
:
: FRAUD 3:

: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
: ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES By A. Einstein June 30, 1905:
: "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity
: c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting
: body...

Third postulate:-
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO and you have to
agree because I'm the great genius, STOOOPID, don't you
dare question it. -- Albert Einstein,


Give it a rest andro .. you keep saying that same things over and over
without a single reason for why that would be a problem .. why the time for
light to travel from A to B should be different to the time to travel the
same distance from B to A


But he is right. Time and speed in a gravitation field depend on the
intensity of the field (g value) and depend on the direction of the movement.
See Inverse Square Law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_Square_Law
Therefore the velocity and consequently the travel time is determined
by the direction of the movement within the gravity field.
Even light has to obey this law, cf. the above weblink.

Even Einstein has admitted this in his book. Einstein even goes further and
says "... the law of constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo [...] cannot claim
any unlimited validity." (Einstein's book "Relativity", Ch.22, p.85).
Ie. Einstein says that light speed is not constant even in vacuum space!
This is obviously correct, also due to his own equivalence principle!
Ie. accelleration/deceleration in free space can be considered like being in a gravity field.
So here are even double arguments which back the fact that the speed
of light is not constant when:
1) in gravity field, or
2) accellerating/decelerating
What remains is that the constancy of the speed of light is valid only
in situations where SR applies, ie. practically only in free space AND
either at rest or at a constant v.
And as everybody knows (should know) for real world applications SR is useless...