On 29 Ago, 18:09, wrote:

1. *Your "ideas" don't count because they are not viable.

just the time it was/are/will be adopted by NASA or ESA or (at least)
some space forums' "experts"...

2. I worked on SDLV's in the early 1980's, long before you knew about
shuttle

words, words. words, words, words... (and no one evidence, as
usual...)


3. *Those SDLV's looked just like Direct and not your fast-slv

I've already written an article and (posted everywhere) with clear and
strong evidences of the exact DAY and HOUR where the Direct concept
and name was born

4. *I have worked on one idea that has more of a chance of happening
than any of your ideas. *A manned spacecraft on EELV's

assuming it's true, you're just one of several thousands peoples that
have "worked" about manned EELV spacecrafts from '50s to today

5. *I don't feel the need to put my ideas on the internet. The
internet is not the only place for ideas. * I have better avenues to
circulate my ideas.

internet is not a "bad place" but (simply) the modern version of books
and magazines (as Wikipedia clearly shows) and it's not the ORIGIN of
the idea but (simply) the "mirror" of the real world, so, an idea is
available on the web, not because you put it here, but (simply)
because this idea was BORN (someday) then EXISTS (somwhere)

if your "avenues" have not a "mirror" on the web (or on a paper book
or magazine or university lecture, etc.) they (simply) don't exist!

rockets, spacecrafts, engines, etc. are NOT "secret weapons" but
(simply) TECHNOLOGIES that must be revelaled and built to be useful

all technologies become OLD in a few years... so, it NOT credible that
you, a space company, a lab, a space agency, an industry or anyone
else "invent" something new and useful in the '80s but NEVER REVEAL IT
in the next 20-30 years!!!!!!!!

it's not credible that a concept developed in '80s was NEVER PUBLISHED
in a book or a study or a document that now could be an evidence of
them!!!

just words, words, words, words, words

you haven't invented NOTHING, you haven't worked on NOTHING, you have
NO evidence of NOTHING... ALL peoples that have REALLY worked on
"something" in '80s or before or later, are well known, they have a
name, their name is on the web, on wikipedia, on NASA and aerospace
companies' public documents, on books, etc.

you (simply) don't exist! you're just a Direct's PR-man (or part of a
Direct's PR-"crew") that posts hidden under several nicknames
everywhere on the web to support the Direct-lobby and insults
everybody else

you contradict yourself and your own words!!! ...WHY should one that
worked on rocket projects HIDES these projects (that could have some
real interests for many peoples on the web) because "has better avenue
than the web" but, in the same time (lireally) SUBMERGE the web (he
"don't like") with a flow of words, words, words, words

all peoples that actually HAVE "ideas" want their ideas to be known
everywhere, developed and built, they don't HIDE an idea for 20+
years, just to post on a forum to say "I've invented it in '80s but
I've no evidence of that since I've some special "avenues" to run
it"

you have NOT just ONE idea! all peoples that HAVE ideas are HAPPY to
talk of them with other and always want to demonstrate to be the first
that have had it (and give evidence of that) NOT saying just words,
words, words, words...

..