View Single Post
  #20  
Old October 19th 16, 09:29 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Jeff Findley[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,307
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.

In article , says...

isn't that a great pix of Hiellary, your leader. [ugh]

She has already re-purposed the funding for the
"US Occupation of Planet Mars"
to her remodel of the "White House" into the "White Castle" with Throne


You really are being a ass aren't you?

Jeff


well you're abrasive asshole, it is what you do, but that is expected as
you have little scientific/engineering facts to contribute.


LOL, you mean like the cites provided that you've largely ignored?

your "Occupy Mars" idiocy is in with the Smoke-um Dope-um crowd.


Wrong crowd. I have an aerospace engineering degree and don't tend to
hang out with the "Smoke-um Dope-um crowd". More like the hang out with
other engineers at lunch on Friday and have one beer.

and moronic "Lets build a STEEL PLANT on Mars"


That wasn't me, but there is nothing fundamental which prevents doing
such a thing.

try building one in the USA first, extremly hard to do because of all
the regulations,


Mars is going to have the same regulations then?

and now you want to go pollute a entire pristeen planet ?


Who said anything about releasing waste from the process to pollute the
planet?

Space Elevator too ?


Once the materials are good enough and can be produced economically in
the quantities needed, why hell not? In the long run it would be a lot
better than chemical propulsion.

Jeff
--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.