In article ,
(Nicholas Fitzpatrick) wrote:

In article ,
Herb Schaltegger wrote:

Look at the Subject header, why don't you? Does the word "Apollo"
provide any context? It should, after all. If understand that Project
Apollo was a U.S. program, than any "localization" issue with regard to
the subject at hand is moot.

Ah ... now we see the mindset that lost that Mars probe!

Nick

God almighty - READ THE DAMNED SUBJECT LINE!

The entire (as in "sole," "solitary," "unitary," "only") issue is the
comment of the first poster to which I responded to the effect that only
"normal" people could follow the discussion.

If the subject is the Apollo Project gas system (and it is - see above),
why the hell do you have to consider "localizations"? The standard
Imperial system units in U.S. aerospace practice at the time are very
well understood.

--
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
Reformed Aerospace Engineer
Columbia Loss FAQ:
http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html