On May 27, 5:11 pm, wrote:
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/sep...s#.UaPz90jnitI

You can add the following to the list. shrug

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...838215db63f7ba

Another one is the pre-1915 derivation of the perihelion advance of
Mercury. Previously, Paul Gerber had derived this same thing by
modifying the Newtonian gravitational potential to include (dr/dt)
terms. Before GR, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar
modified the Newtonian gravitational potential to include (1/r^2)
terms instead of (dr/dt) terms. He should have easily found the right
gravitational potential, but he fvcked up really bad. shrug

Now, does the Schwarzschild metric really predicts a 43” seconds of
perihelion advance per century? Besides the Euler-Lagrange equation,
associated with the angular displacement, that deals with the
conservation of angular momentum, there is another one that deals with
r. From the latter Euler-Lagrange equation derived using the same
method as Gerber, it only yields half of the so-called accepted
number. The self-styled physicists are guilty of cherry-picking the
equation of their very choice to derive the desired results. shrug

Of course, the loudest mouth to support SR or GR are the ones who
cannot do any math to save their Einstein Dingleberry asses. Does
anyone what to go there? shrug