On Nov 8, 11:03 am, " wrote:
On Nov 8, 10:52 am, " wrote:
On 7 nov, 17:28, Roger Hamlett
wrote:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:54:12 -0800, "
wrote:
On Nov 6, 3:05 pm, " wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:42 pm, " wrote:
If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, (v. earth orbital
speed)and after a 70 million km travel the speed has become C
(extinct), --after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar
signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v. Venus orbital speed)
and after 54 million km this speed has become also C, THEN FIGURE 3-4
( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPAINED,
by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction
distances".
LeoVuyk.
For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry
of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ity-dependent-
lightspeed.html
"Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of
about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968,
page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below.
Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital
Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity
influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see
below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov,
(Binary HV 2543).
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...all-anomalies-...
The key though, is understanding that doppler measuerments, do not
involve changes in the velocity of the carrier, but changes in the
frequency of a _modulation_ carried on this.
The velocity of the signal in each direction is the same (C). There is
no 'starting off at C+v'.
Best Wshes- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
Roger, Sorry for the delay.
The key is that the speed of light is in a complex way
dependent on the mass of the carrier inside the Solar frame..
see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...y-dependent-li...
LeoVuyK- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Sorry, again
The key is that the speed of light is in a complex way
dependent on the mass of the carrier inside the Solar or the Earth
Frame .
Thus a GPS satellite's mass has NO influence on the speed of the
emitted signal.
Into the direction of the Earth there is an Earth related lightspeed.
Hoewever, into other directions the GPS signal has a complex change
which is more related to the Sola frame.
Which is why Satellite GPS PODs are found to be often unreliable.
because the biased measurements are assumed to be depending on the
direction to the Earth orbital motion.
see:- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
To get more clarity about the key arguments I am using for my LASOF
idea, I searched and found new impressive data.
It is a clear example that GPS signals skimming the earth passing near
or at Higher altitudes, are less related to the earth frame and more
by the Solar frame.
In this case (CHAMP) providing outliers of 200 meters.
A clear example of GPS signal failures for the CHAMP Low Earth
Orbiters at 430 km altitude, is one of the reasons that so called
Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination (POD) by GPS readings is not
possible. Several other ground based systems and complex computer
programs are needed to compensate these errors.
However, if the LASOF idea about gravity (or Mass) related lightspeed
is incorporated in the GPS readings, then these errors are supposed to
vanish for a great deal.
I made a copy with my comment see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...influence.html
The information described above was found in "Near real time Precise
orbit determination of low earth satellites etc. pdf page 85, by:Tae-
Suk-Bae 2006. Ohio state university. See:
http://www.ceegs.ohio-state.edu/gsre...report_481.pdf
Leo Vuyk.