View Single Post
  #2  
Old September 3rd 09, 09:56 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Helmut Wabnig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 86
Default Finite Relativism Disproof

On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:41:55 -0700, Phil Bouchard
wrote:

This is an official thread to confirm Finite Relativism remains
undisproven. Once again the paper can be found at the aforementioned
address:
http://www.fornux.com/personal/phili...ci_physics.pdf

As noticed by Jim Black, section 1.4.1 has a slight error but is
irrelevant to the rest of the paper. This was taken out in other versions.


Thank you,
-Phil



Could you please clarify something from that pdf:

First let’s define its postulates:


The kinetic energy of body relative to its
maxima induces dilation of time.


There is a grammatical error in that sentence
(article missing)

The kinetic energy of a body relative to its
maxima induces dilation of time


What are the maxima (plural) of a body (singular)?


w.