View Single Post
  #8  
Old February 24th 10, 01:10 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Allen Thomson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 372
Default NASA's new focus plan revealed


So why not continue to use the RD-180 or, if needed, license the
RD-170?


Reducing our dependency on Russia would be a good enough reason by
itself, IMO.



I've lost track of this stuff somewhat, but doesn't P&W have license
(and presumably the blueprints and manufacturing techniques) to
manufacture RD-180s independently of Russia? Pat's point about the
engine being designed for somewhat more demanding requirements than
needed now should be noted.