On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 7:37:06 AM UTC-4, Gary Harnagel wrote:
On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 6:26:47 PM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:

On Mon, 9 May 2016 16:51:11 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel
wrote:

On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 8:38:34 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:

On Mon, 9 May 2016 06:56:16 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel
wrote:

On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 7:21:13 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:

On Mon, 9 May 2016 05:01:42 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel
wrote:

What he has wrong is that GR is an extension of NG.

Semantics. We could say that GR extended NG. We could say that NG is a
subset of GR. There are lots of ways of connecting the two.

Only in a chronological sense.

I disagree.

Nobody cares what you do with your brain.

That sounds like Snell again, more interested in empty insults than
engaged discussion.

YOU should talk! YOU don't discuss ... YOU argue:

"Discussion is always better than argument, because argument is to
find WHO is right and discussion is to find WHAT is right." - Anon.

Notice that peterson's statement,

"That sounds like Snell again, more interested in empty insults than
engaged discussion"

is an empty insult rather than engaged discussion. Ironic, no?