November 3rd 13, 03:40 PM
posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity
|
|
|
Now, Google Groups does this:
On 11/02/2013 08:55 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
Yes, "Google Advanced Search" has vanished.
But, now, Google Groups does this:
Some of the Usenet threads/topics I've been in:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/Alt.Free.Newsservers/Jeff$20Relf|sort:date
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/News.Software.Readers/Jeff$20Relf|sort:date
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy/Jeff$20Relf|sort:date
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/Sci.Physics/Jeff$20Relf|sort:date
Also, you can use Google Groups to point to an article, like this:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...I/0Eg5aLNbi0UJ
Which is a link to the source, header and all, unformatted.
⋅AND⋅, when you hit the big "Back Arrow" button,
it places you on the proper article, in the thread/topic,
properly formatted, on the proper page of the thread/topic ! !
Sure, you can't search by Message-ID ( which never really worked ),
and you can't really seach all of Usenet ( it's VERY poorly indexed ),
but you can still find/link to your articles, in your newsgroups.
Articles that spawn a huge thread/topic, lots of replies,
are more likely to be indexed, so they appear in a normal Google Search.
Remember, Usenet is a free⋅for⋅all, uncensored/unmoderated.
So, unlike Wikipedia, Usenet articles aren't likely to float
to the top of your search results.
----------
Low⋅Cost, Text⋅Only servers are the fastest and most reliable; to wit:
Glorb: http://glorb.com/contact.php , ask for "unfiltered access".
BlueWorldHosting: http://usenet.blueworldhosting.com
When not overloaded, ＜some binary servers＞[*] are good too; for $5,
you get more than enough gigs, assuming you don't download binaries.
[ *: "usNews.BlockNews.NET:119" and "News.US.Usenet-News.NET:119" ]
--
Mike Fontenot
|