W5DXP wrote:

Starblade Darksquall wrote:
There's also a chance that the universe is much older than they
originally thought it was.

In an AtomTotality, not a BigBang, the cosmos has layerings of age
where you can have stars older, much older than the newest recent
minibigbang. Stars of the Uranium AtomTotality and stars of the
Thorium AtomTotality are much older than the newest minibigbang
of the Plutonium AtomTotality. In fact, you need not have minibigbangs
but rather instead it is the cosmicray and gammaray bursts that materialize

that creates the newest layer of the cosmos, going from the 5f2 to the
5f4 to the 5f6.

This layering was what the teams of scientists of Wendy Freedman
and Alan Sandage were discovering but since both of those teams are
laboring under the false theory of BigBang, they cannot do honest science
but are having to fudge their data to come up with one age.



Or they are measuring the age of the universe with seconds now that
are a different length than the seconds were back then.

Three ways to go on that --

(1) In an AtomTotality theory, time is not absolute but time is
Radioactivity
itself. In the last AtomTotality of a Uranium AtomTotality some 20
billion years ago, the time span of a second was much different than the
current time span of a second in a Plutonium AtomTotality. And time
spans were much different in each of the AtomTotality layerings and
the reason for this is because say we were transported back in time
(time travel is impossible to do in AtomTotality theory) to the Helium Atom
Totality there would not be any atoms in existence beyond the first 3 or 4
elements and that the composition of the Universe in a Helium AtomTotality
would be mostly hydrogen with some helium and thus since **time
itself** is a measure of the presence of atoms with their radioactive
decay that a second in this universe would be very much different from
a second as measured in a future AtomTotality such as Plutonium
AtomTotality.

(2) The speed of light is a constant, never changing and thus the time
duration of radioactive decay for a radioactive isotope of hydrogen
is also constant no matter what the composition of the Universe is
whether a Helium AtomTotality that has no elements beyond lithium
or a Plutonium AtomTotality of present. Such that the time duration
of a second is the same no matter what the AtomTotality is and that
the decay rate of any isotope is a constant also just as the speed of
light is a constant.

(3) Compromise-- speed of light is a constant and that stable
elements are a constant but what changes is the radioactive isotopes.


--
Cheers, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
"One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured
against reality, is primitive and childlike ..." Albert Einstein


Einstein should have completed his half-truth with an additional sentence:

"All of our science is our number #1 best picture of reality because
God is Science and Science is God." Anything else that claims to be
truth and reality and is not science is just a feeling or perception by
individual/s.

Einstein was confused by Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum
Mechanics and dropped out of science. But if he had pushed
QM to its limits that the Universe itself was an Atom, then he could
have made the logical leap forward of a Spinozan pantheism that
God is Science, and Science is God.

Archimedes Plutonium,
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies