In article .com,
wrote:
People often think that if a Completely Free launch Vehicle appeared,
launched, say, from a runway, that NASA could simply shut down their
other launch ops and have cheap space flight. Not so. Closing down the
VAB, the Shuttle pads, the processing facilities and all the rest will
cost *vast* sums of money. You can't simply turn off the lights and
padlock the doors.

You could come close... if you were sure you'd never want to use them
again, and you didn't care about preserving them as historical relics or
about dealing with things like the asbestos in the ceilings. :-) Witness
other launch facilities on the Cape where the decision was "abandon in
place".

And further down the road, if "shuttle derived" is completely scrapped,
America's ICBM/SLBM fleet is screwed. No RSRM = no ATK-Thiokol = No
Minuteman/Trident missiles.

However, one can reasonably argue that that's the USAF and USN's problem,
not NASA's. If it's a choice between losing the big-solids capability and
spending money propping up their suppliers, they either cough up the cash
or learn to do without.
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. |