View Single Post
  #143  
Old December 27th 09, 03:02 AM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Dec 24, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:

On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:


Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted.


Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.


At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?

Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.

Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?


Perhaps there’s enough magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud of its very
own.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en#
“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”

"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm

So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise on this
one?

~ BG